· Rachels indirectly distinguishes between moral relativism and cultural relativism. Moral relativism assumes the total lack of universal ethical truths, the lack of any benchmark to measure right and wrong. Cultural relativism may refer to behaviors, customs and traditions that do not carry any moral stigma · Moral relativism is the belief that morality does not relate to any absolute standards of morality with which everyone should comply with. It believes there are circumstances and situations in which actions or behaviour, that are usually considered to be ‘wrong’, can be considered ‘right’. Many of these circumstances are to do with religion and What is moral relativism essay? Moral Relativism is the idea that moral standards have intrinsic value, but are not universal or objective. Moral truths are based on either cultural of individual beliefs. Moral relativists believe that moral
Moral Relativism Essay | Bartleby
Below are the introduction, body and conclusion parts of this essay, moral relativism essay. The theory of Moral Relativism suggests that no principle or value is completely right or wrong; it moral relativism essay on the circumstances such as the particular society in which one lives in. This proves to be a problem when discovering the actual truth as people begin to think that the truth relies on who maintains it or that the only truth is their own. This can lead to truth having no significance because everything depends on the society to which one belongs to.
This ideology originates from Ancient Greece at the time of Homer 8th century BCE. People within Greek society began to come across different ideas if what it meant to be moral. They questioned their own absolutist ideals, resulting in the discussions of the Sophists, a group of wise men, who disputed that all morality was relative — what was right and wrong was different within every society. Protagoras said that nothing is absolutely right or wrong and that each person moral relativism essay their own final point of authority when making decisions.
I really enjoy the effort put in. Moral Relativism allows people to choose their own code of behaviour as long as it is within the law of society, an act may be good for one person but bad for another, or good in one cultural moral relativism essay but bad in another, but cannot be either good or bad alone.
Consequently, we should not ask ourselves whether something is good or bad in general, but only whether it is good or bad in a particular situation. This is a teleological approach, as you are deciding whether something is good or bad depending on what the outcome will be.
Thomas Hobbes, an English Philosopher, helped to develop the foundation for most of Western political philosophy from the perspective of the social contract theory. According to the social contract theory, consent is the basis of government, moral relativism essay. It is because people have agreed to be ruled that governments are entitled to rule. Hobbes indicates that right or wrong is determined by the need for people to control their naturally selfish desires and to work for the interest and well-being of the group.
He also points out that right and wrong are influenced by what is needed to minimise conflict and promote survival. In his book, Mackie articulates that our moral beliefs do not shape the societies we live; rather our morality is shaped by society. He moral relativism essay on to suggest that people want to believe morality has an objective truth, moral relativism essay, but that this is based on the psychological need to try and find an objective reality to base our views on and to give us confidence.
However, there is no valid way of proving which moral view or belief is better as moral moral relativism essay requires us to be non-judgemental, moral relativism essay. Mackie concludes by saying that there is no real ultimate standard of right or wrong, which is a common relativist view.
Cultural Relativism is less on a personal level as what is right or wrong depends on the culture. Cultural relativism is the view that all beliefs, moral relativism essay, customs, and morals are relative to the individual within his moral relativism essay social context. This means that we should adapt our behaviour to conform with the society we are in as well as behave in the way appropriate to the circumstances we moral relativism essay in.
As a result, having good manners shows one has morality. Cultural Relativism is a pure example of the moral diversity amongst different cultures. This is what is known as the diversity thesis. Since, there is so much diversity across and amongst cultures there can be no one true morality.
There are many other examples of culture clashes and rules of conduct for different places; however, for the relativist such differences do not present any problems because their own moral code applies to the society in which they live in.
Moral Relativism is co-joining with religious authority. Many people in this day in age are not religious and therefore need some set standards of morality. Relativism also allows us to understand other cultures and to be tolerant of them. Nevertheless, Moral Relativism has its weaknesses and many Absolutists have criticised the theory. Some criticisms highlight that according to Relativists there is nothing wrong with slavery, torture or human sacrifice, if that is what a society practises then so be it.
Additionally, Relativism gives little reason for behaving morally except to be socially accepted. There are several other flaws to the Relativist theory, moral relativism essay. Along with this, ethical beliefs can change when they are challenged, primitive practises do discontinue. Moral relativism, because of its open-minded implications for ethics, is a matter of great importance; what we think about moral relativism matters.
This is a situation where philosophy has a practical impact on society as a whole. It is important that the theory, and its consequences, are more widely understood in order to enforce true morality. Moral Relativism Essay. com, Dec 06, Accessed October 7, comDec Moral Relativism Essay Topics: Culture Epistemology Social Contract. Essay, Pages 5 words, moral relativism essay. Get quality help now. Proficient in: Culture.
Cite this page Moral Relativism Essay. Recent essay samples. Society's Moral Degradation or Moral Evolution Pages: 4 words Cultural Relativism Essay Pages: 7 words Cultural Relativism or Ethical Imperialism Pages: 36 words Difference Between Relativism And Absolutism Pages: 2 words Cultural Relativism as Moral relativism essay in a Lifestyle of Counterculture With No Clear' Right Pages: 5 moral relativism essay Raising Ethical and Moral Children Essay Example Pages: 7 words Moral Values Essay Pages: 5 words Moral Compass Essay Pages: 5 words Moral development in children Pages: 6 words Moral Values Pages: 6 words.
Avoid submitting plagiarized assignments, moral relativism essay. Not Finding What You Need? Copying content is not allowed on this website, moral relativism essay. Ask a professional expert to help you with your text.
ASK writer for help. Give us your email and we'll send you the essay you need. Send me the sample. By clicking Send Me The Sample you moral relativism essay to the terms and conditions of our service. We'll not send moral relativism essay spam or irrelevant messages. Please indicate where to send you the sample. Please check your inbox, moral relativism essay. Go to My Inbox. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible.
Get Your Job Done By a Professional Skilled Expert. Hire Writer. Money Back Guarantee.
Moral Relativism - Explained and Debated
, time: 13:45What is moral relativism essay?
What is moral relativism essay? Moral Relativism is the idea that moral standards have intrinsic value, but are not universal or objective. Moral truths are based on either cultural of individual beliefs. Moral relativists believe that moral · Moral Relativism Essay: Moral relativism (ethical relativism) is a moral position, which comes from the fact that all possible moral standards and evaluation criteria is quite relative and equivalent (exactly-not-valuable) because there is no absolute moral standards system or absolute criterion. It assumes that there is no absolute, universal good and evil, there is only · Rachels indirectly distinguishes between moral relativism and cultural relativism. Moral relativism assumes the total lack of universal ethical truths, the lack of any benchmark to measure right and wrong. Cultural relativism may refer to behaviors, customs and traditions that do not carry any moral stigma
No comments:
Post a Comment